| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggrobot Elite Member

Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 53567
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:47 pm Post subject: Halo Infinite PC Performance - it's not pretty... [54404] |
|
|
The chaps over at KitGuruATech have posted an extensive benchmark video, this time they take a close look at the Halo Infinite campaign. Dominic benchmarks a total of 29 GPUs, looking at Medium and Ultra settings over a range of resolutions. How well does Halo perform?
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
psolord Elite Member

Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 960 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why is it not pretty?
I did a couple tests myself (non monetized videos-not clickbaiting). These are 60fps target runs and not max performance benchmarks per se.
There is some stuttering in the videos, but these are from the recording. I mean there are frames missing from the recording. Dunno why, but I think the reason is I recorded in desktop mode instead of full screen mode. The 3060ti is new for me and I have no experience with shadowplay recording, since I have an external recorder on my other systems. But you can see the framerate/frametimes graph and other info on the top right.
So...
1) 2500k+3060ti, 1920X1080, Ultra, Outdoors section
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnMnMTUDxwo
The 3060ti is at 65-70% gpu load most of the time.
2) 2500k+3060ti, 3840X2160, High, Outdoors section
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF8dRkNJLYM
GPU load is around 80% for 60fps
Also I cannot stress enough, that I am using an 11yo 2500K here. No that was not a typo. And as a reminder the Sandy Bridge only had PCI 2.0 connectivity, with 8b/10b encoding, so a lot of overhead.
This is just a test system, not a final configuration.
I will test my 1070,970,2700k and 8600k soon enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gx-x Elite Member

Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 2652
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's not pretty because it's an xbox360 game...upscaled and "remastered" in all ways to be on newer consoles but it was done in the way that required minimum amount of work, probably done by one person during 10 years.\
Go play Quake Champions.
EDIT: I just looked at your video, it looks fine, I expected a lot worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|