| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggrobot Elite Member

Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 53567
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:29 am Post subject: Cyberpunk 2077 Update 1.5 is 50GB [54709] |
|
|
CD Projekt RED has released the highly anticipated Patch 1.5 for Cyberpunk 2077. This update is 50GB in size, and you can find below its full patch notes.
Now whatâ??s also cool here is that CD Projekt RED has added a built-in benchmark tool on PC. As such, PC gamers can adjust their settings and run the benchmark i
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sabot Elite Member

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2397 Location: The Dark Side of The Moon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said ages ago with garbage like this; “free game with the patches”.
It’s totally unacceptable. I’m of the age when in the 90s Activision sent everyone a CD-ROM with patches for its games at the time. Yeah people registered. So what if the patches were smaller, they still ate into dialup and it was a hassle finding then - other than PCZone/games mags. But this…this is having a pissing laugh. 50GB *just* for a patch.
Again, free Blu-ray with this garbage on sent out to all Cyberjunk owners. Generation saps
50GB = is the size of a FULL game. How much in total in the patches they’ve dropped is it equal to now in GB, I wonder that those that stuck with this have downloaded inc the game!?
How is that going to equate to space on a puny console HD? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Csimbi Elite Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 5355 Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2022 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The full 1.5 CODEX release is 60Gs or so, the language addon is another 40G or so.
I am not sure why though, it does not look or sound that good (just think of the big, clunky minecraft-like buildings).
For reference, the full Witcher 3 is 52Gs or so (this includes the two large DLCs).
The HD Reworked project adds another 10Gs for great visuals.
A current game, Days Gone - which does not look too bad - is 61Gs (the Razor release).
Spellforce 3 Reforced is 50Gs (CODEX).
What was that game a few years back? Quantum Break or something?
That was 100Gs or so due to all the video content.
That said, Cyberpunk does not seem that big. But yeah, I wonder what in there takes all that size, considering everything looks alike and sounds alike. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sabot Elite Member

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2397 Location: The Dark Side of The Moon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2022 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cyberpunk has had 10 patches so far. This being 60-50gb and one other I seen was over 33gb. So just two patches is over the install size of the full game of 70gb. So what size where the other 8 patches -on top of the 93gb patches above. It’s like a rip-off version of ‘Early Access’. “We’ll Chuck out a half finished unplayable pile of crap, then they can pay to download the rest of the game that should have been in it”. Saves them repressi…… sorry, can’t be arsed loading a full game on the server - I meant.
Let’s face it, it would have been quicker and cheaper for the user to wait for the *complete* fixed game on a server and download it in one go.
It’s a sad state of affairs that joe-public today accepts patches of that magnitude for a AAA game.
In EA, it’s acceptable and expected as the game is just bare bones and will or won’t grow. I’ve got half a dozen. But I’m talking 1 to 1.2gb downloads - even 10 patches is like 1/10th the patch 1.33 of cyberpunk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lorcro2000 Elite Member

Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 469
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, it's bullshit that it took them this long to create what is realistically a version 1.0 - even though they call it 1.5. This is the minimum it should have been on launch.
But that's also why this was a scandal that literally affected CDPR's stock values, and for the first time had a game suspended on Sonys playstation store, this was an epic fuck-up.
Still - it's nice that they've picked things up and improved them. And gamers on old cards, be it AMD or Nvidia, can use AMD's FSR to get more frames for free. I'll probably do a fresh playthrough and spend some time with the game now.
As for the patch sizes - they don't actually stack on top of each other, space wise. I got the GOG version without DRM and the patches have obviously replaced old data. They are indeed weirdly huge, though, seems like there should have been a way to do deltas of the changes rather than multiple 50 gig downloads but oh well, doesn't bother me any ,I have fiber... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sabot Elite Member

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2397 Location: The Dark Side of The Moon
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lorcro2000 wrote: | Yeah, it's bullshit that it took them this long to create what is realistically a version 1.0 - even though they call it 1.5. This is the minimum it should have been on launch.
But that's also why this was a scandal that literally affected CDPR's stock values, and for the first time had a game suspended on Sonys playstation store, this was an epic fuck-up.
Still - it's nice that they've picked things up and improved them. And gamers on old cards, be it AMD or Nvidia, can use AMD's FSR to get more frames for free. I'll probably do a fresh playthrough and spend some time with the game now.
As for the patch sizes - they don't actually stack on top of each other, space wise. I got the GOG version without DRM and the patches have obviously replaced old data. They are indeed weirdly huge, though, seems like there should have been a way to do deltas of the changes rather than multiple 50 gig downloads but oh well, doesn't bother me any ,I have fiber... |
I know about the patches not stacking, I’m just referring to the total amount of downloading that has to be done just for an ‘average’ 67-70GB game install. Some folks don’t have very good broadband or even limits - because of the size it was corrupting downloads.
The Witcher 3 literally went to their heads. Biggest monumental feck up by a games company in a long time that I can even remember. The only stuff I remember is hype and bad sales days. Daikantana for eg.
Re- cyberpunk; I read on the forums it reset your players points and left them without clothes!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devilhood Elite Member

Joined: 09 Jun 2004 Posts: 701 Location: Cydonia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Csimbi wrote: | The full 1.5 CODEX release is 60Gs or so, the language addon is another 40G or so.
I am not sure why though, it does not look or sound that good (just think of the big, clunky minecraft-like buildings).
For reference, the full Witcher 3 is 52Gs or so (this includes the two large DLCs).
The HD Reworked project adds another 10Gs for great visuals.
A current game, Days Gone - which does not look too bad - is 61Gs (the Razor release).
Spellforce 3 Reforced is 50Gs (CODEX).
What was that game a few years back? Quantum Break or something?
That was 100Gs or so due to all the video content.
That said, Cyberpunk does not seem that big. But yeah, I wonder what in there takes all that size, considering everything looks alike and sounds alike. |
If you think it looks like Minecraft, you either haven't played the game, or you're using a CRT monitor at 640x480 resolution.
Personally, I'd recommend playing it instead of thinking about epeen sizes. The game is easily up there as one of the best singleplayer shooters. Is it perfect? No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Csimbi Elite Member

Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 5355 Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| devilhood wrote: |
If you think it looks like Minecraft, you either haven't played the game, or you're using a CRT monitor at 640x480 resolution. |
I am not playing it, I am observing what I see in youtube videos and there, the buildings look like clunkly Minecraft blocks.
Here is a fresh video, go to 4:03, pause and look in the distance.
What the fuck are those?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00ov3zo2Vi0
Then, take a Witcher 3 video like this and pause at 1:03 and look in the distance again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx8kQ4s5hCY
Those are buildings.
I am not paying more than 10 euros for this shit - that's what a stupid shooter is worth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
devilhood Elite Member

Joined: 09 Jun 2004 Posts: 701 Location: Cydonia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Csimbi wrote: | | devilhood wrote: |
If you think it looks like Minecraft, you either haven't played the game, or you're using a CRT monitor at 640x480 resolution. |
I am not playing it, I am observing what I see in youtube videos and there, the buildings look like clunkly Minecraft blocks.
Here is a fresh video, go to 4:03, pause and look in the distance.
What the fuck are those?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00ov3zo2Vi0
Then, take a Witcher 3 video like this and pause at 1:03 and look in the distance again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx8kQ4s5hCY
Those are buildings.
I am not paying more than 10 euros for this shit - that's what a stupid shooter is worth. |
You're comparing two completely different architectural styles, with both games having a completely different scope in-terms of what is explorable and what isn't.
To even entertain that video comparison would be pointless, but to use that as the superficial basis for whether or not you would play Cyberpunk? Not sure if that's a great deciding factor You'd miss out on a lot of great games doing that.
I avoided the hype back when Cyberpunk first came out, and just played it, absorbed it and enjoyed it. Like I said before, it's not perfect, but I didn't waste time eyeballing videos and graphics to nitpick. Keanu is awesome in it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|