| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| maga wrote: | | devilhood wrote: | | xxxx wrote: | | beh, depends on your rig i guess, but i imagine i wont have any probs with HL2 or STALKER. When i ran Alpha of STALKER i had amazing FPS. |
the STALKER alpha is pretty old isn't it? I never managed to try that one, was it any good? |
the STALKER alpha had Quake2, maybe Quake3 style graphics, one huge level, no enemies, and allmost all the weapons....and it ran at 100-150 fps.
very underwhelming |
ur a FuKn liar. you just proved to me with this post just how much a a complete moron you are and also that you never tried the alpha. god man, where did you crawl out of????? quake2 graphics, man ur a complete idiot. this guy is the most clued out. congrats man ur right up there with stumpass. what thrill you get from blatantly lying is beyond me. get a life loser. as to devilhood, if it's still available, ya get it. very cryptic to run and i can guarantee you this moron maga didn't even see it. and maga you dumbass moron, there was 4 or 5 maps included in the alpha...imbecile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | And guys, try "http://imageshack.us", free image hosting. All my screenshots are hosted there ^_^ |
thanks, i will use that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Same old fodder |
|
|
| blackflag wrote: | Lets cut to the chase
Who cares about Bump Mapping and all that crap, This game does not deserve all the praise and hype it is getting in all the mags and on every game site.Where is the INOVATION, where is the blow me away GAMEPLAY, there is nothing new is this game, the graphics are great the sound is great , it looks slick on a brand new top of the range Graphics card, that probaly cost you Fortune, and will be outa of date before you even make the first repayment.We should not be amazed by such games and there flash new Graphics, WE should expect it as consumers, truly great games push the boundries on all fronts, whether it Gameplay, AI, or storyline,DOOM3 only delivers on one of these, it's that old banger that you have been driving around for years, that you decide to spraypaint and put on a go faster stripe, and stick in a novelty horn. At heart it's still Doom, still a laugh to play around with, but you know you are gona have to move on someday and face the facts, that this game is exactly the same as the first doom game you ever played. |
Correct. thank god there's hope in gamers today. thanks to Sly for the image links, now i can show what all these arguing morons don't want you to see, show you just how bloody blind they are. Now's time to show poor textures, painted on shadows and various other extremely lame parts of Doom 3, backed by the God himself Carmack.. pff. oh and would you all like them at Ultra Quality? I assure you it's still the EXACT same. after i post the shots, it's all i got to say on this game. It's fun, it's overrated by nearly all reviewers and it's replyability is a joke. As blackflag said, it's a good couple of hours of fun then repetitive and eventually you have to face the facts, it will be shelved as you move on with better titles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
slayer, ur nice enough to post the links for posting images. but these comments of yours just revealed your knowledge. you did a very poor job of requoting Gamespot. what is with you people?
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6104596/p-7.html
| Quote: | | Bump Mapping: Like it sounds... It makes bumps. Well, not exactly. It's more like imaginary bumps. These bumps are added to surfaces to demonstrate a height effect. As in real life, a flat concrete floor isn't completely flat. There are little cracks and crevices that give the floor a rough texture. Bump mapping allows the game to simulate these cracks and crevices with shadows. |
Either you people are on crack or something, but you should get your eyes checked. in the gspot shots of bump mapping, there is ZERO difference. holy god, i hope carmack clears this up soon.
and as to your comments, no don't agree. people i work with have already come to this site, read hx review then read the comments and got more info than they thought. those people are telling their friends as well to come here because it's not just the review it's gamers comments in light of the game itself and it all sums up a very good picture of the game. the unfortunate part is there are lots in this thread that don't have a clue, including those that posted pictures trying to prove something that's not there. and there are complete idiots like maga who would go slander a game and prove at the same time he never even tried the alpha because had he tried it, he would have known there were various small maps included, not just one big open one. i ask you maga, by default, what was in the default map that came with STALKER. Name me something that was in it thats relevant to the map. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maga
Junior Member
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 211
Location: HERE, NOW
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hahaha, i won't mention anything in that map, because you're too stupid to get a clue. (a big swarm of rats ! does that ring a bell, you quack ?)
and, I don't understand what is your major malfunction, captstar and xxxx, are you complete morons, you really can't see the bumpmapping on the door ? you're blind or something ? have you played even played the game ? what's up with canada these days ? mad cow disease ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucas
Junior Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xxxx wrote: | | Either you people are on crack or something, but you should get your eyes checked. in the gspot shots of bump mapping, there is ZERO difference. holy god, i hope carmack clears this up soon. |
take your own advice. if you cant spot the massive differences in the two gspot images you:
a. need your eyes checked
b. are a moron who is loading the same image twice
c. are being a jackass on purpose
personally, I think its d, all of the above |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lucas u rn't worth the breath. maga, come on man, u told us STALKER sucks and has Q2 or Q3 graphics. tell us something that was in the default initial map. if not, u are as i said, a Fukn liar. till then keep talkin trash man, waste of breath is what you r to me. at least there's one good thing maga and lucas, it's ur bedtime soon.
if u guys think that wall on the left on gspot is good, then u clearly take anything as good and obviously have very low expectations of what can REALLY be done today with our cards, that, if you can call it bump mapping is the worst bump mapping i have ever seen(and that's high quality? pfff). i will post some shots to show what reviewers were too afraid to show including those in this thread who chose ironic shots.
after that, i leave you to bicker and complain amongst yourselves. this game is a 8/10 and thats stretching it. taking in all the bad parts of this game, it's even possible the game is a 7/10. by the time i'm done it, likely tonite or tomorrow it will be most likely follow my 7/10. sorry, i expected more and to be honest this game for "me" was a let down.
Last edited by xxxx on Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucas
Junior Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xxxx wrote: |
and if u r all happy with the texture on the left wall on gspot, then so be it. obviously that's your level of quality assessment. my preference is better quality. |
I notice you editied your post, since you had a challenge for someone to show you the bump mapping and now its gone. realise you were wrong at last?
heres another image just to rub it in, right from your gamespot artical with identical pics. I've even put little white boxes to make it easier to see the highlighted areas for someone with your vision
http://img34.exs.cx/img34/9281/hardware_screen010.jpg
I've never said the textures in doom3 were great, thats not what this flamefest has been about. its consisted of people telling you there's bump mapping while you insisted there wasnt. I know you're about too try and twist this so that you never claimed that, but fuck you. you were wrong, you are still wrong and you will always be wrong. live with it
[edit: oh look! he's editied it again so now he apparently never wrote what I quoted. how unexpected] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FX5950
Contributor
Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 28
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You know xxxx, you keep run your mouth about "you rn't worth the breath", "you ain't worth a reply" but yet you keep persisting on going on with yourself. And talk about beating a dead horse! What would you do with your time if it wern't for these threads? Not much I'm sure. Come on, let's hear some more great 'come backs' of yours like 'moron' 'imbecile' and 'idiot.' If you need some more ideas I grabbed a quick 10 fabulously brillant comments of yours and left them in the camera review thread. (And to think I only took those from the last 3 or 4 replys of yours.) Sad, sad, sad...and YOU are the one that preaches about respecting HX's rules and the site. You're obviously troubled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
+azumi+
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:05 pm Post subject: Doom 3 |
|
|
blah blah, xxxx you're a fag and who cares.
Back to the real topic...Doom3.
It is not worth the price, the wait, nor the hype.
A very noisy (alarms, screaming etc), dark (lol that flashlight shit in a futuristic game),
The game play is standard basic no brainer, the graphics are good (no major upgrades needed as everyone thought). It's lucky to get the 91%, it's more of a 85% - at best.
Farcry is still the best sp fps game by far, nothing close. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptStar
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 273
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What are you talking about Azumi, Far Cry sucked!
The AI was horrible, the graphics were good, not great, and I got bored playing it.
And I think most of you need your eyes checked if you cant see a difference in the Doom 3 screens with and without bumpmapping. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xxxx
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 1755
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lucas wrote: | | xxxx wrote: |
and if u r all happy with the texture on the left wall on gspot, then so be it. obviously that's your level of quality assessment. my preference is better quality. |
I notice you editied your post, since you had a challenge for someone to show you the bump mapping and now its gone. realise you were wrong at last?
heres another image just to rub it in, right from your gamespot artical with identical pics. I've even put little white boxes to make it easier to see the highlighted areas for someone with your vision
http://img34.exs.cx/img34/9281/hardware_screen010.jpg
I've never said the textures in doom3 were great, thats not what this flamefest has been about. its consisted of people telling you there's bump mapping while you insisted there wasnt. I know you're about too try and twist this so that you never claimed that, but fuck you. you were wrong, you are stil wrong and you will always be wrong. live with it |
kid... listen, ur an idiot and i havent liked ya since ur first post. if you had a clue, you'd likely be dead by now, cuz someone would have offed you a long time ago. but anyhow, the level of bump mapping in the game is LOW if anything. do you need a list of dev's to stand behind me to tell u it's low? pff, like u'd believe it anyhow, lmao. u haven't got a clue and the majority of u in this thread don't have a clue of what a quality game is. but there are some that do, im not generalizing. it's not just a question of bump mapping in the game. it's a question of the real requirements to enjoy this game given what we see in the game. there is nothing in this game that is phenominal, its a poor successor to a great set of games and it's truly surprising what you need to run Ultra when we have to stare at the comparison pics to see a difference. now backed by sites that have overrated it, likely reviewed the game minutes after playing it. in the first 10mins of playing this game, i was laughing because of all the hype i mentioned earlier and the fact the game wasn't gonna be that great, and i was right(my sources were right actually). the review sites might want to argue it but it's right in all ur faces. poor textures, poor bump mapping in the maps that up close look like something from D1 or 2.. and so what if i was wrong about the bump mapping, i don't care we are all wrong at points in our life i admit it. although i still say the bump mapping is of the lowest quality ever and it's so damn hard to notice in this game anyhow it's a miracle someone was able to show it. but still, look at the wall on the left side, you call that good graphics? pfff. u all obviously lack the gaming experience i got, that's for damn sure. this is an overated mediocre game at best that in 4 months time from now will be sitting on everyones shelf. i'd be highly surprised if this game gets beyond patch 1. what's the point of patching something that has no community. you think people will play MP in this game? dream on...
As a developer from Ubi said, and i quote from my msn. "Doom 3 is a piece of $hit, it's a Quake 3 engine with better graphics and zero innovation aside from things that will be predominant as minor elements in all future games including our own. Doom 3 can be summed up as a souped up Quake 3" he's talking the heat effects and glass glare effects. and you want to diss him, well i'll only tell you he is a member of one of the best teams going games online right now. that's all i care to say and maybe later i'll post some nifty quality images you can continue to argue about without me. i dont have time to blah all day here, it's like talking to a bunch of Forest Gumps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucas
Junior Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptStar wrote: | I really hate the ignorance of the 1 post idiots on these forums. As I have said, along with xxxx, there is only bump mapping on enemies. THERE IS NONE ON THE WALLS AND THE FLOORS AND EVERY OTHER ITEM. THERE ARE PAINTED ON PIPES, PAINTED ON SHADOWS, etc.
Carmack cut corners, but this game is still really good. problem is my game keeps locking up. |
| CaptStar wrote: |
And I think most of you need your eyes checked if you cant see a difference in the Doom 3 screens with and without bumpmapping. |
talk about split personalities. show me the enemy in the shot i just posted, I can certianly see it on the walls and door http://img34.exs.cx/img34/9281/hardware_screen010.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptStar
Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 273
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lucas you idiot, thats flat. Flat as Kansas. That is not bump mapping.
There are so many morons and ignoramus' on this forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lucas
Junior Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xxxx wrote: | | kid... listen, ur an idiot and i havent liked ya since ur first post. |
ditto
| xxxx wrote: | | if you had a clue, you'd likely be dead by now, cuz someone would have offed you a long time ago. |
this comment makes no sense, but lets go on.
| xxxx wrote: | | but anyhow, the level of bump mapping in the game is LOW if anything. do you need a list of dev's to stand behind me to tell u it's low? |
a minute ago you had a list of devs standing behind you telling us there was NO BUMPMAPPING, what happened to them? you made them up right?
| xxxx wrote: | | it's not just a question of bump mapping in the game. |
actually, if you look back 95% of this thread is arguments over bump mapping or the "lack of it"
| xxxx wrote: | | there is nothing in this game that is phenominal, its a poor successor to a great set of games |
| xxxx wrote: | | and it's truly surprising what you need to run Ultra when we have to stare at the comparison pics to see a difference. |
an optician. go see one. i can spot the difference in the gspot thumb nail, your eyes are obviously getting bad with age.
| xxxx wrote: | | and so what if i was wrong about the bump mapping, i don't care we are all wrong at points in our life i admit it. |
you certianly seemed to care in the other 90% of this thread where you refused to see you were wrong
| xxxx wrote: | | although i still say the bump mapping is of the lowest quality ever and it's so damn hard to notice in this game anyhow it's a miracle someone was able to show it. |
no one said it was great, just that it was there, nice try at a recovery there btw. "anyhow it's a miracle someone was able to show it" LMAO
| xxxx wrote: | | but still, look at the wall on the left side, you call that good graphics? |
thats the part with no bump mapping you asshat. geeze... get a clue
| xxxx wrote: | | pfff. u all obviously lack the gaming experience i got, that's for damn sure. |
glad to hear it. the less like you i am the better
| xxxx wrote: | | this is an overated mediocre game at best that in 4 months time from now will be sitting on everyones shelf. |
agree'd (man it hurts to agree with you)
| xxxx wrote: | | As a developer from Ubi said, and i quote from my msn. "Doom 3 is a piece of $hit, it's a Quake 3 engine with better graphics and zero innovation aside from things that will be predominant as minor elements in all future games including our own. Doom 3 can be summed up as a souped up Quake 3" he's talking the heat effects and glass glare effects. |
and quake 3 was just souped up quake 2, which was just souped up quake. none of them are revolutionary. your point is?
| xxxx wrote: | | and you want to diss him, well i'll only tell you he is a member of one of the best teams going games online right now. |
and this makes his opinion untouchable, why? not that im disagreeing with it, i just think that opinions should be judged on what they are, not who has them.
| xxxx wrote: | | i dont have time to blah all day here, it's like talking to a bunch of Forest Gumps. |
most ironic quote EVER! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
