Gameguru Mania

ggrobot · Elite Member Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 53567

The chaps over at

DailyTech ran their X1900XT against their eVGA GeForce 7800GTX 256MB in a few popular game timedemos. The cards were both benchmarked on an Opteron 165 workstation with 2GB of PC-3200.

Radeon X1900, or R580, is in many ways what the R520 should have been before all the die respins. R58

Read more...

Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news

DELETED · Guest

DELETED

No.21 · Contributor Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Posts: 39 Location: Arroyo

Really? Where do you have to wait 3 months?
Plese show me.

Sabot · Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:15 pm Post subject:

Oh good fare comparison,not! 512mb card versus a 256mb..... everyone knows that COD2 **benefits** ever so slightly from running a 512mb card over a 256mb Rolling Eyes

Plus of course the *Price* of the ATI over the nVidia is rediculous. for what? just over a dozen fps more! LOL and just how many people play at 1600x1200 these days? Considering most have a maxed out 1280x1024 TFT.
When the figures are around the standard 1280x1024 the ATI is level pegging with nVidia i bet.

I've sat playing FEAR at 1600x1200 with everything on AAx8 AFx16 and it was easily playable, it's only on *certain* levels -as with all games- that it has an fps hit. Of course this is YOU the gamers OWN EYES that are happy with what gameplay is like.

When your compairing 2 cards with only 12 fps or so difference your just pissing in the wind trying to tell the difference on screen.

ATI are flapping!

Talk about pumping it up....