Gameguru Mania

ggrobot · Elite Member Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 53578

In an Activision conference call yesterday, chairman and

CEO Bobby Kotick specifically noted that the next Call of Duty game, which is due to hit stores in Q4 2006, is "not a PC product, it's a console product and it's all next-gen." This is not as bad as it seems though. They stated this is

Read more...

Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news

DELETED · Guest

DELETED

Genoism · Elite Member Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Posts: 339

are you a dumbass, they made the move most likely because they're sales were far stronger on the console and the cost benefit of putting it out on the pc as well was at a loss for them. Its a business not a popularity contest.

xxxx · Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject:

Bill u r pretty right with rehashed, but you forget something. COD 1 was already very fun to play. Most didn't want the game to change that much, including me. All I wanted was fantastic graphics and better anti-cheat. We got the fantastic graphics and for anyone playing COD1 this is enough easily to move to COD2..

I personally think PB is a crock of crap and in COD2 you are right, I really doubt that PB is on.. Why is it in every game I play I see status messages about PB yet in COD2 I don't?.. I still see idiots playing with aimbots and stuff and it's really sad.

It's better than it was before the patch but the cheating has to stop in this game for it to be more successful. As for moving to console.. I can't blame em, but it would seem that COD will likely come to PC anyhow..but who's going to buy it considering the lousy support the PC is getting right now? And how much better are the gfx going to get? When is the next patch for COD2? A year?

Their support gives Valve a run for it's money in terms of LOUSY.

Hey Bill, if you want to chuck me a million considering you don't want to be rich... Appreciate it!

DELETED · Guest

DELETED