| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggrobot
Elite Member
Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 45820
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:59 am Post subject: Modern Warfare 3 Tested, Benchmarked [31913] |
 |
|
The chaps over at Techspot have posted their Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Performance Test. Here\'s an excerpt:
If you\'re still intent buying MW3 on PC, you should be able to scrape by with nearly any modern entry-level gaming hardware. The fact that an $80 Radeon HD 6670 can deliver 30fps at 1680x1050, whi
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 4194
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.abc.net.au/technology/articles/2011/11/10/3361041.htm
Piece of junk, SP ~6 hours ($10/hr?pfft). Scripted to shit. Nice gfx, yep! Cheat infested. Same BS gui as MW2, no browser consolized hunk of shit. That sums it up for PC anyway.
Do yourself a favour, just forget this was ever released or go buy it on console. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
miglaugh
Elite Member
Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 362
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BF3 isn't so bad when compared to this, is it?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tom
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 4194
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BF3 is miles better than this MW3 crap. BF3 is a PC game this is a consolized hunk of shit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tride
Elite Member
Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Posts: 566
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh, those dumb ass benchmark web sites maan... They test MW3, like this 5 year old engine is some kind of a challenge for any of todays VGA's....lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tom
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 4194
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't really care that it's an old engine. It does look great. No doubt about it. You don't need a new engine to make a game look great. The gfx in BF3 and MW3 were always doable years ago. BF3 is not a new engine, it's the same engine just bug fixed and cosmetically improved. The 6 million copies of MW3 was 99% console. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Csimbi
Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 4804
Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tom wrote: | | You don't need a new engine to make a game look great. |
On that, I agree and I'd like to add:
You don't need a new engine to make a game more fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baconnaise
Elite Member
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 710
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look at EvE Online. First MMO maybe even game on DX9 and it was gorgeous in beta and still is even after the updates. Guild Wars was another one that looked great years later. GW I think was unreal not sure what iteration if any. CCP with EvE just did amazing things on their own pretty much.
It seems to be more about the work put into it along with some care just like building something with wood etc and you can make it sturdy and perhaps last years  . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Csimbi
Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 4804
Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Guild Wars was great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
