| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggrobot Elite Member

Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 53580
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: Battlefield 2142 shots [22071] |
|
|
The official Battlefield 2142 website has launched containing new info, media and screenshots from the upcoming sci-fi multiplayer shooter from Digital Illusions and Electronic Arts. In other news, EA's Battlefield 2142 pre-order program has gone live with Gamestop and EB Games! If you pre-order Battlefie
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xxxx Elite Member

Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 1755 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Looks good, but I don't care. The game is too big for those that just play on their own. For the time I get enjoyment playing solo, this title is just totally worthless to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djRom Elite Member

Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: South Jersey, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| See, I am the total opposite. I only get enjoyment out of multiplayer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
miglaugh Elite Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Posts: 367
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think he meant he only likes multiplayer where he can go solo. Battlefield as of late takes too much teamwork and clan-like activity. So much for the whole Army-of-one mantra.
Also, Whats up with the high polygon counts on the characters, vehicles, buildings and such, and then the ground is one texture map with 0 depth. It just makes the environment look terrible.
What would be so hard about having sand, or snow, or mud, that actually behaves like it should and gets imprinted with footprints and vehicle tracks? Just having a flat texture that never changes and actually looks like the characters hover over it is just lame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gordho Contributor

Joined: 15 Jul 2004 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| miglaugh wrote: |
What would be so hard about having sand, or snow, or mud, that actually behaves like it should and gets imprinted with footprints and vehicle tracks? Just having a flat texture that never changes and actually looks like the characters hover over it is just lame. |
you could maybe have some recreation of that....or you could have a sustainable 30 fps and more then one model on screen. you decide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xxxx Elite Member

Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 1755 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gordho wrote: | | miglaugh wrote: |
What would be so hard about having sand, or snow, or mud, that actually behaves like it should and gets imprinted with footprints and vehicle tracks? Just having a flat texture that never changes and actually looks like the characters hover over it is just lame. |
you could maybe have some recreation of that....or you could have a sustainable 30 fps and more then one model on screen. you decide. |
But that would also encompass a good engine and a well tuned engine. I don't believe BF is either.
And yeah, I meant I like to play more Rambo so games that require clans or teams I find hard to enjoy. I've bought all the BF stuff but I have to stop because it just isn't worth it for me. A game like Sin or COD is more up my alley for enjoyment as a Rambo  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darknothing Elite Member

Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 578 Location: Canada,Hamilton
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
all this game looks like is a quick mod from BF2 and nothing more.
go buy quake wars instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|