Updated:03:22 PM CEST Jun,21
(new)
66 lottery login
91 club
okwin
bdg game
55 club
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
|
GeForce4 and GeForce4 MX Details - tech
|
| (hx) 10:07 AM CET - Dec,25 2001 |
| XBitLabs.com
have managed
to find some interesting info on the features of the new chipsets from NVIDIA, which
are due in the beginning of next year. We are talking about NV17 and NV25, of course The rumors say that there will be two models in the GeForce4 family and three models in the
GeForce4 MX family:
- GeForce4 Ti 1000. This is the fastest graphics cards built on GeForce4
chip working at about 300MHz frequency. The card will have AGP 8x interface and 128MB DDR
SDRAM memory working at 700MHz.
- GeForce4 Ti 500. This is a bit slower solution with around 275MHz chip
frequency and 600MHz memory frequency. Although it will have AGP 4x interface, the card
will still come with 128MB graphics memory.
- GeForce4 MX 460. This is the eldest representative of the GeForce4 MX
family. It will probably have 4 rendering pipelines and DirectX 8-compliant T&L unit.
The amount of DDR graphics memory used (with 128bit bus) will be cut down to 64MB, and its
working frequency will be reduced down to 550MHz. The core will work at 300MHz.
- GeForce4 MX 440. These cards will go with 64MB DDR SDRAM with 128bit
access bus. The memory working frequency will be 400MHz and the core frequency
275MHz.
- GeForce4 MX 420. According to the available data, this GeForce4 MX version
will be targeted for the Low-End market that is why the cards built on it will have 64MB
SDR SDRAM memory working at 166MHz. The core will work at 250MHz. Besides, It looks as if
there were only two rendering pipelines in this modification.
| |
| Comments from Bully | posted - 11:48 AM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | As long as it's only prices for the High Society, I don't give fuck about Geforce, just like the games that demand such hardware...
I don't like the "working-together to get after your money" technique at all.
| |
| Comments from MadSparx | posted - 04:14 PM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | Cripes! They haven't even fully supported the Geforce 2 or 3 in games yet. Now they have the Geforce 4. Game programmers are getting REALLY sloppy now when writing games. | |
| Comments from Chris | posted - 05:32 PM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | It's a cheap technique because they are running behind the superiour ATI Radeon 8500..... Now that's what I call a videocard. No lame NoVidea for me. | |
| Comments from info...cont. | posted - 06:22 PM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | There's no such a AGP 8x mainboard out yet. | |
| Comments from Stinky | posted - 07:32 PM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | Oh great, now I haveto go and get a new motherboard. :)
| |
| Comments from Amidaru | posted - 08:24 PM CET - Dec,25 2001 | | If ATI RADEON is so 'superiour' why does it suck? Oh, lameass driver support. Always have, always will.
If you can't afford a kickass videocard, go stick with 2D cards. It'll be compatible with your cga monitor, at least. | |
| Comments from Chris | posted - 12:27 AM CET - Dec,26 2001 | | Amidaru,
If you think it sucks because of it's driver support, then that's YOUR problem. Actually, NO I cannot afford a videocard priced that much, or should I say, I don't want to ? You think you're great ? Think again..... It's just thanks to their driver support that we now start to see that ATI is way ahead of nVidea.... Ok nVidea may have the ultimate drivers, and the quality is still far more inferior to the Radeon, ain't that a shame you silly unknowing patriot ? | | The old comment system has been replaced. Use the regular FORUMS!
|
|