Updated:05:35 PM CEST Jun,04
(new)
66 lottery login
91 club
okwin
bdg game
55 club
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
|
Nvidia launches mainstream GeForce GTX 465 - tech|
| (hx) 10:54 AM CEST - Jun,01 2010 |   
Nvidia has officially announced the launch of their mainstream DirectX 11-based card, the GeForce GTX 465. Priced at around ~$279 the GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB of memory and a 607MHz clock speed. Here a roundup of the first GeForce GTX 465 reviews from PC Perspective, HotHardware, HardwareHeaven, THG and Legit Reviews:
There are few comparisons to be made here, the first of which is the new GeForce GTX 465 pitted against the AMD Radeon HD 5850, both of which will be available in the $279-299 range. In our gaming tests we found that both cards brought the same gaming experience and performance in our array of titles. The NVIDIA offering did take a slight lead HAWX and Metro 2033 while the AMD Radeon option was faster in DiRT 2. Other than that, you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference when seeing them side by side. This is not a coincidence people - NVIDIA has obviously tweaked the specs, clocks and pricing for this exact reason.
The next question is about the intra-NVIDIA comparison of the GTX 465 and the GTX 470. Amazingly, the change in specifications pretty much EXACTLY determined the performance differences between the two options as we saw clear 25-28% performance gaps between the GTX 465 and GTX 470 in all GPU-bottlenecked resolutions of our games. Considering there were 27% fewer shaders, 27% fewer texture units and 25% fewer ROPs that exactness is impressive. I guess we could have just skipped that whole multi-day testing process, huh??
The new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 brings the performance and features of the GF100 architecture to a lower price point and does a good job of making a case for itself against the competing AMD products. SLI performance also impressed us with scaling rates as high as 90% in some cases and with a base price of $279 could make for the first consumer-friendly option for NVIDIA Surround support coming later in the summer. The Galaxy version of this GPU is a custom design with a unique fan that is both quieter and more functional with a foldout mechanism for cleaning and maintenance. The Radeon HD 5850 still has a couple of features I wish we found in the NVIDIA options, like support for three displays, but that is somewhat offset by things like CUDA and PhysX that you might not use quite as often but are there only with NVIDIA. GF100 is finally becoming more accessible to the gaming enthusiast and Galaxy's custom design only adds to the package.
|
|
last 10 comments: | beqerel | (05:47 PM CEST - Jun,01 2010 ) | articles with nvidia are not interesting anymore
they are failing big time
5970 rules | |
| Thudo | (08:36 AM CEST - Jun,02 2010 ) | | Yeah the current GTX 4xx series are a purile joke but I'll never go ATi simply because the drivers suck massive c*ck and are brutally unreliable on third-party apps which rely on the video drivers. Granted, Catalyst is great for latest games but try some video app like a modding tool and you'll likely get some BS happening. Even Autodesk doesn't favour ATi video cards. Talked with Autodesk support people who are personal friends and ATi Catalyst drivers are a nightmare for support. | |
| Tom | (08:15 PM CEST - Jun,02 2010 ) | | I wouldn't touch an ATI card if you held a gun to my head. Been there and done that. I lived the nightmare of ATI drivers and support and their dumber than shit community sites. No thanks, never never again. I also have zero interest in a new card, my GTX 260 is more than good enough and I see ZERO on the horizon to warrant replacing or upgrading it. | |
| Thudo | (09:02 PM CEST - Jun,02 2010 ) | | Problem is this current gen of 4xxx are real garbage (marginal benefit for more power/higher heat/higher cost). ATi's current gen clearly is superior but never their drivers, PERIOD! Its not the mainstream software I am concerned with Catalyst but those apps that need driver support that just choke. This is where tools I use would likely die except for Nvidia Forceware. Catalyst is fine with mainstream sh*t but watch out with third-party or Autodesk, for example. Ouch! | |
All comments
|
|