Updated:05:35 PM CEST Jun,04
(new)
66 lottery login
91 club
okwin
bdg game
55 club
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
|
250GB hard drives roundup - tech|
| (hx) 03:07 PM CET - Feb,03 2006 | The chaps over at
StorageReview have published their 250GB hard drives roundup - they compared
the Hitachi Deskstar T7K250, Maxtor DiamondMax 10, Samsung SpinPoint P120,
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 and WD Caviar WD2500KS HDDs. All drives in this roundup
feature two or three platters and incorporate a native SATA interface running at
either 1.5 or 3.0 GB/sec. Some manufacturers outfit their
budget-oriented drives with 8 megabytes of buffer while two have doubled cache
to roomier 16-megabyte standard.
Hitachi Deskstar T7K250: The Deskstar 7K500 is easily the fastest 7200
RPM drive around. A bit gets lost in translation, however, when moving down to
the 250-gigabyte model. The T7K250 lags the WD Caviar WD2500KS by a bit in the
Office DriveMark and places fourth overall. Hitachi's drive finishes first or
second in all other performance tests, however, and as a result is the fastest
overall drive featured in this roundup. Its seek noise and active power draw,
however, remain on the high side when contrasted with the competition.
Maxtor DiamondMax 10: This aging design seems to have a lot of pep
remaining, especially evidenced by the smaller but more recently revised 250 GB
drive's besting of the slightly larger (but older) 300 GB flagship. Maxtor's
drives tend to enjoy a cost advantage... at the time of this writing, it is the
only unit in the roundup with a best-case price tag resting just under $100. A
decent performer, the DiamondMax 10's power dissipation levels and seek noises,
like the Deskstar, sit slightly above the rest of the pack.
Samsung SpinPoint P120: Samsung's flagship no longer stands contrasted
against competing units twice its size. In our productivity suite, the drive
offers decent performance, placing near the top in both the Office and High-End
tests. For gaming purposes, however, Samsung's design languishes near the bottom
of the charts. On the plus side, even when going up against same-size
competition, the SpinPoint's noise levels and power consumption are among the
best around.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.9: In its flagship 500 GB incarnation, the
Barracuda 7200.9 is a middling performer at best. The loss of half its capacity
and half its buffer leaves the 250-gigabyte 'Cuda a relatively poor performer.
Though it offers environmental and gaming performance on par with the SpinPoint,
Seagate's drive does not match Samsung's strong productivity scores. The
Barracuda's server scores, on the other hand, lead the pack. No discussion of
the 7200.9 is complete without mentioning that Seagate remains the only
manufacturer to back its SATA drives with the same robust 5-year warranty that
protects its SCSI line. While we do not necessarily believe that a longer
warranty automatically translates into a more reliable product, it is clear that
many readers do- if you are looking for peace of mind, get a Barracuda.
Western Digital Caviar WD2500KS: The WD2500KS is built on an older
platform, evidenced most clearly by its less dense, 83-gigabyte platters. It
nonetheless offers above-average performance and manages to capture the number
one slot in the Office DriveMark as well as our World of Warcraft trace. The
drive's idle noise floor is not nearly as loud as objective measurements may
suggest. It also offers the coolest overall operation of all drives in the
roundup. The Caviar is the only review drive that does not offer NCQ - while
this is no drawback in single-user applications, the drive's scores suffer under
multi-user patterns.
We would be remiss without noting that, overall, performance differences
between all five contenders remain relatively small. These days, 250
gigabyte SATA drives are commodities; all players have honed their offerings
down to levels where distinguishing between them on the basis of performance,
environmental factors, and price can be quite difficult. Absolute fastest?
Hitachi. Least expensive? Maxtor. Quietest? Samsung. None of these factors
matter? Choose your favorite brand.
|
|
last 10 comments: | xxxx | (08:35 PM CET - Feb,03 2006 ) | | I've had and actually just replaced my "IBM" Deskstar drives. I had a total of 3 over the course of the past 5 years. All of them have failed. I don't know if anything changed since Hitachi took over but I switched to Western Digital and they are a little noisier but I've never had a problem with them so far. I was a real fan of the Deskstar drives but seeing them all fail just because of heavy usage didn't inspire me to go get another. They only have a limited 3 year warranty, after that you are on your own... unless their warranty has changed. | |
All comments
|
|