Updated:12:47 AM CEST Jun,04
(new)
66 lottery login
91 club
okwin
bdg game
55 club
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
|
F.E.A.R. impressions and benchmarks - briefly|
| (hx) 03:08 AM CEST - Aug,09 2005 |
The chaps over at
Bit-tech take a look at the new
singleplayer demo
of F.E.A.R. which was released last week. They have posted
their impressions of the game, as well as
some benchmarks on a wide range of graphics hardware:
The 7800 can clearly handle this kind of resolution with ease - it's better suited to running 1280x960 with 2xAA and 8xAF at maximum detail (perhaps minus the soft shadows). The 6800 can actually handle 1280 with no AA and no soft shadows, or possibly 1024 for extra smoothness - if you're using a 17" TFT, you'll want the former. The 6600 is right at home at 1024, and gave us a pretty decent game experience - but for really smooth gameplay, you will want to cut out some of the high detailing (especially the soft shadows, which really are a performance killer). The 6200 with TurboCache dies at this resolution, and with a card of this class, you'll be playing at 640x480 with all the details down to low - but, crucially, you will at least be playing (and for a card that costs less than £50, that's not bad...) If the 5900 XT is representative of the last generation, including the ATI 9800 series, you'll do ok here - you might be able to squeeze in at 800x600 with low details, or 640x480 with a little bit more eye candy.
|
|
last 10 comments: | Badmagic | (03:59 AM CEST - Aug,09 2005 ) | | Range of different cards? They are all NVIDIA and those benchmarks are nonsense, I run a lesser rig with an X800 XT and still maintain higher fps using fraps. | |
| sirsmithy | (03:12 PM CEST - Aug,09 2005 ) | Yea i have a nvidia g6800gt put everything on max, had no poblem.
demo was very short, only took me less than 10-15 mins.
looks ok, a little scarey | |
| Sabot | (06:05 PM CEST - Aug,09 2005 ) | quote: If the 5900 XT is representative of the last generation, including the ATI 9800 series, you'll do ok here - you might be able to squeeze in at 800x600 with low details, or 640x480 with a little bit more eye candy.
Well something must be seriously screwed up between the 5900 XT and ATI 9800?
I have a 9800 and can play full detail except shadows and max textures (256mb card needed) being on.
x2AA at 1024x768, there isn't *any* slowdown and it looks gorgeous.
Shows you exactly how untrust worthy these comparisons are :roll:
RAM and system build being more important than basic specs. | |
| xxxx | (12:58 AM CEST - Aug,10 2005 ) | | X800 XL, totally maxxed at 1280x and sweet sweet fps. | |
All comments
|
|