Updated:11:06 PM CEST Jun,04
(new)
66 lottery login
91 club
okwin
bdg game
55 club
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
|
AMD 90nm power consumption measured - tech|
| (hx) 10:58 AM CEST - Oct,04 2004 |
TechReport
has compared power consumption of 90nm Athlon 64 3500+ to the 130nm version
(both chips running at 2.2GHz) The tested system included an Asus A8V Deluxe
motherboard, 1GB of Corsair XMS 3200XL DDR400 memory, an NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
graphics card, an Asus DVD-ROM drive, a Maxtor MaxLine III 250GB SATA hard
drive, and an OCZ PowerStream 470W power supply. Here's a taster:
Incidentally, there have been rumors that the new 90nm Athlon 64s incorporate some planned enhancements to the K8 core, including SSE3, better data prefetch, additional write combining buffers, and a tweaked memory controller. We haven't yet been able to confirm with AMD whether the new 90nm chips include these changes, but the preliminary indications seem to be negative. CPU-Z identifies this chip as a Winchester core and doesn't list SSE3 among the supported extensions. More tellingly, I've run a handful of synthetic memory benchmarks on the 90nm 3500+, and scores didn't differ significantly from the 130nm chip in my preliminary tests. For now, the new 90nm chips appear to be a successfully die shrunk version of the current Athlon 64: cooler, with less appetite for power, and otherwise largely unchanged.
|
|
last 10 comments:
|
|