View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ggrobot Elite Member
Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 45810
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:55 am Post subject: Crysis Demo Performance Analysis [24426] |
|
|
Both PC Perspective and
TweakTown have Crysis demo performance analyses:
The Crysis settings system works by only offering you resolutions that the computer can handle. What's frustrating is that none of the cards here today gave us the ability to run at our native 2560 x 1600 resolution with any deta
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Renton Junior Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 Posts: 174 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: DX10 & DX9 Performance |
|
|
Ok, here's the real deal, with playable framerates to have a very smooth gameplay i put this configs for Vista and XP, both works over 40 FPS.
On Vista, 1024x768, no AA, no AF (cause introduces a deffect on the vegetation), all very high except shadows on low.
On XP, 1280x1024, no AA, 16x AF, all on high.
In all resolutions and configurations with AA enable the game turns unplayable, even with 2x no trmmaa.
Core 2 Duo E6750@3,20
EVGA 8800GTX@600/1000
X-FI Fatal1ty
ASUS P5KC
Corsair 8500C5@1066x2GB
West.Dig.2x250GBSATA2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
darknothing Elite Member
Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 578 Location: Canada,Hamilton
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have a 22' wide screen so 1024x768 will look like shit but ill try
to bad they made a game for a system that will cost alot of cash., not alot of people can afford. id say about 10% if that can afford the system they made it for.
the above settings worked great for me but the shades and shadows on low made the game look strange but very playable thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sabot Elite Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 2082 Location: The Dark Side of The Moon
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read somewhere on the Crysis site that the game (engine) is actualy 2years ahead of current hardware. Now since DX10 is on it's infancy -and crap!, that means nothing out today is going to play it in all it's glory.
It's like i said before; it's not a new phenomenon.
Flight sims have been produced like that for decades!! Also for that matter, hardware is aged as soon as you buy it - a new game comes along pretty soon that kicks the crap out that 2 month old graphics card that cost you $$$ £££
Far Cry, Oblivion are two examples of high end games that were ahead of their times. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lmer Elite Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 329 Location: Zagreb, Croatia
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry Stumpus, but i do not see any point in that. They could've released it two years earlier then. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|