Why would we buy Battlefield 2142? - briefly
(hx) 05:32 PM CEST - Sep,02 2006
- Post a comment The chaps over at
NGOHQ.com bring up a the great point that if
Battlefield 2 is still buggy, why in the hell would we invest more money on
another game when the first one isn't even near being fixed yet? Here's a
taster:
On the 23rd of May, (3 months ago) Digital Illusions and EA released Battlefield 2 v1.3 patch. With the new patch, a serious server and client stability issue was exposed. Suddenly, both clients and servers started to crash randomly. The developer immediately confirmed the issues and claimed that they started working on a workaround patch to solve these issues. At the beginning of July, (one month after the original patch) the developer released a beta patch that solves the stability issues. But, since this is a beta release, the player will no longer be able to play on the official v1.3 servers, and on a very limited amount of beta v1.4 servers.
Digital Illusions has announced that it will release the final v1.4 patch on the 15th of August (two months and half after the original patch) but suddenly, instead of releasing this patch - or at least some kind of hotfix to resolve the crashing issues - they decided to delay it. Just for the record, they already fixed that issue in the beta, and they didn’t release a hotfix to resolve that critical issue. They decided to keep the product broken and to delay the patch instead of giving us some small patch to solve it.
The hours became days, the days became weeks, the weeks became months, and here we are at September - three months after they released the problematic v1.3 patch - and still without an official fix to these stability issues.
|