Impossible Creatures

Updated:12:03 AM CEST Sep,22

NEWS / RSS
CHEATS

REVIEWS

ARTICLES

HARDWARE

DEMOS

FORUMS

LINKS (new)

66 lottery login

91 club

okwin

bdg game

55 club

CONTACT

Please e-mail us if you have news.

Gameguru Mania News - Feb,23 2003 -

Impossible Creatures - in-house
(hx) 02:17 AM CET - Feb,23 2003 - Post a comment / read (16)

Impossible Creatures (formerly known as "Sigma") is genetically enhanced 3D real-time strategy game developed by past masters Relic (makers of Homeworld) and published by Microsoft. In the year 1937, young journalist Rex Chance ...read a full review [Microsoft]

last 10 comments:

giGGler	posted - Feb, 23 2003 - 02:37
I tried the demo of this awhile back and found it to be weak an uninspiring. Found no fun in this at all.

Bombkit	posted - Feb, 25 2003 - 00:16
This game is a good example of a great idea implimented badly.

bart	posted - Feb, 25 2003 - 19:18
omg this looks like such a bore!! wohoo lets fight animals against animals...woohoo... SNORE! great idea! LOL! OMG I'd rather fight with smurfs, better pull out my Coleco Adam, looks more fun than this crap. LMAO

Timeless_OMO

posted - Feb, 25 2003 - 20:23

I have played this game for about 3 months now (counting beta) and I am very pleased with this game. IC has awesome graphics (extremely well polished), great camera control, simple, fun and intuitive game play and a lot of strategy. And even without formations, IC is full of tactics, despite what the reviewer said. Formations are only one part of tactical gameplay. Intelligent use of natural terrain advantages is essential in this game as well as micromanagement of units that would otherwise die if left to their own devices. After you play this game a while and shed your old expectations (I'm an old SC fan and miss booming tanks, whirling turrets, etc), you begin to relish fighting with these mutant creations. It's awesome listening to the powerful sounds your mutants make as they trample your opponents into the ground and watching their visual effects while utilizing specials like frenzy or leap attack or while under the influence of auras like herding or packhunter. I love the powerful "boom" of a siege tank push or reavers smashing marines into red goo and I can tell you all that IC is just as thrilling, if not more so, in the feeling you get from spreading carnage with your favorite units. Very satisfying and extremely addictive game.

Robert	posted - Feb, 26 2003 - 16:09
Thanks to 'Timeless_OMO', I agree with you entirely!

bart	posted - Feb, 27 2003 - 21:45
ya and you both work for the company developing the game or beta testing. What can you expect. :\|

Timeless	posted - Feb, 27 2003 - 22:53
LOL. I'm a gamer. Nothing more. Beta was available to all who wished to download it. I wasn't even interested in the game until I started playing it a while and at the time I was playing WC3, another game I like immensely. Maybe I work for Blizzard, too, eh? - Timeless Freakshow

Stinky	posted - Feb, 28 2003 - 01:02
the screenshot showing isnt very impressing.. I cant judge the gameplay and i dont plan too, so as far as i get is to download it or play it at my friend's place if they ever have this game. I have better use of money than to blow it on some games with new ideas and EA isnt prodicing anything good recently...

Gordon dorn the grea	posted - Apr, 23 2003 - 00:18
This game is like a book of cliches. you get all the BS you want but nothing of great action. UMMM WHERE DA MONEY GO?

Teddybear

posted - Apr, 27 2003 - 11:03

As newbie gamer(surely not my age)its the first game i really liked and kept playing till the end.A game should be easy to handle and doesn't have the need to have 20 different keys to be used for each action.Where is the fun of the game when you have to concentrate you more on the keyboard than watching the game itself.Finally somethingelse than crashing cars and blasting off eachothers head.There's alot more in it if you give it a fear chance.

Orithil	posted - May, 01 2003 - 10:46
The ideas behind this game are solid, the graphics are better than alot of those crappy popular games like RTCW and other boring, overplayed, overhyped, and overused games..some people need to get real about what they're playing, sure, this concept is as old as all the rest, but at least it's done in a somewhat fresh style, unlike same ol' same ol' WC and RTCW type games.

melony hartvard

posted - May, 09 2003 - 02:20

If you like creatures then make your own. This game sucks. whY? ooooo you really want to know ok i tell you. Its called impossible creatures right? well all the creatures in the game suck. they are all just plain regular animals no special monster here expect for the one you find in the bathroom. ya sure they might look at bit different but when it comes down to showing whats in that bitchx bottle all you got is plain old cookies. its a crappy attempt at starcraft remake. THERE IS NO STRATEGY TO THIS GAME!!!!!!. the techinical detail are ok but the game concept is poooor. Somepeople seem to think the formations make a big difference well it does not . its one of those "paper" ideas that never really gets implemented in a good way. when i played this game i think "SUCKERT" ,"SUCKERT" why? cause ya go down and down and down and then it pops back in your face again with a 2% change.then they say its orginal. hey people bubble gum is orginal this game is not.

bilo poo677	posted - May, 14 2003 - 04:14
all i know is if someone gave this game to me as a present i would slap them in the face!

®ß¥!!	posted - Jan, 28 2004 - 21:08
i love this game its not starcraft or anything but its a lot more interesting than just having a race to get to the highest lvl units and swarming in this game a well built low lvl army stands a chance against just about anything all you people that are ripping on it are expecting a clone of SC or WC and thats just stupid...