The FX-60 is the fastest processor out there, and Intel's offerings really aren't coming close in the big picture. Our benchmarks clearly show that this new FX model gives better performance compared to AMD's own Athlon64 X2 models along with Intel's new Pentium-D processors. While Intel has improved performance and efficiency with their new 900-series chips, and they can even win a benchmark here or there, it's still pretty clear that AMD owns the dual-core arena. The FX-60 really is the best of both worlds, as the chip provides excellent performance in both workstation-class application and games.

However, the limitations of the FX-60 chip also reveal potential kinks in AMD's armor, most notably dealing with their manufacturing process. The FX-60 is based on 90nm technology, and AMD is pushing the limits of how far they can take their design while manufacturing at this level. The FX-60 chip chews quite a lot of power, creates noticeably more heat than its predecessors, and generally does not overclock well, all three are signs that their current architecture is reaching its limitations. That's not to say that AMD couldn't refresh their chips to last a little longer, but if they don't do something fast, it's unlikely that they will be able to get beyond 2.8 GHz on their current 90nm tech. Luckily, AMD has 65nm tech in the pipeline, and all signs point to them making the switch sometime this year.

None of these minor nuisances should keep potential buyers away. The price-tag, however, certainly will. The FX-60 is a tough pill to swallow at roughly $1200, especially when AMD just dropped prices on their Athlon64 X2 lineup, and the (still very fast) X2 4800+ processor is nearing half that level at around $700. The FX-60 is certainly not a winner in the price/performance realm, but the FX lineup never has been. It's excessive and un-necessary, but if you're looking for the best, well, here it is.