Gameguru Mania Updated:10:26 AM CEST Sep,21
66 lottery login

91 club

okwin

bdg game

55 club

Playbonus.ca
CONTACT
Please e-mail us if you have news.

(c) 1998-2025 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy statement
SEARCH:
 Gameguru Mania News - Mar,21 2012 -  
60TB hard drives soon? - tech
(hx) 10:46 PM CET - Mar,21 2012 - Post a comment / read (19)
Seagate has demonstrated the first terabit-per-square-inch hard drive, almost doubling the areal density found in modern hard drives. Initially this will result in 6TB 3.5-inch desktop drives and 2TB 2.5-inch laptop drives, but eventually Seagate is promising up to 60TB and 20TB respectively.
o achieve such a huge leap in density, Seagate had to use a technology called heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). Basically, the main issue that governs hard drive density is the size of each magnetic “bit.” These can only be made so small until the magnetism of nearby bits affects them. With HAMR, “high density” magnetic compounds that can withstand further miniaturization are used. The only problem is that these materials, such as iron platinum alloy or a sprinkling of table salt (really), are more stubborn when it comes to changing their magnetism (i.e. writing data) — but if you heat it first, that problem goes away.

HAMR, which was originally demonstrated by Fujitsu in 2006, adds a laser to the hard drive head. The head seeks as normal, but whenever it wants to write data the laser turns on (pictured below). Reading data is done in the conventional way. Just so you understand how small the magnetic bits are in a HAMR drive, one terabit per square inch equates to two million bits per linear inch; in other words, each site is just 12.7 nanometers long — or about a dozen atoms.
last 10 comments:
Csimbi(12:35 AM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
We've been expecting the 4-6TB drives two years ago. Just check where we are now. Barely hit the low end of that promise.
20-60TB? That means 20TB two years from now. But, by then, things might be SSD only. So, unless these drives are available today, the news have no real value.

Genoism(01:45 AM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
we had 4tb hd's two years ago....they just weren't available to everyone. I work in the media business and we've been using them for a long time now.....more than 2 years ago actually.

Csimbi(03:27 AM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
Right. So the news has no real value for us, mortals.

Sabot(03:44 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
One thing is sure, it's going to be fun when that monster fails. :lol:

Csimbi(04:44 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
I guess hard disks like that are built into fault-tolerate arrays, so that should not be an issue. Rebuilding the array will take a long time though, so another drive might die in the process -> be sure to use RAID6.

Ozieo(06:49 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
<running like scared chicken> OOOohh Aaaaargh! The SSD's are drowning our bussiness, let's blow some bubbles or we're history ! <running like scared chicken>

Kompressor(07:23 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
Genoism> we had 4tb hd's two years ago....they just weren't available to everyone. I work in the media business and we've been using them for a long time now.....more than 2 years ago actually. Can you provide some proof that you have ever used or had access to a 4TB hard drive? Picture? Model number? Anything? And I'm talking about an actual 4TB drive, not two or more drives but together in an array to make 4TBs of storage.

Kompressor(07:27 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
Ozieo> <running like scared chicken> OOOohh Aaaaargh! The SSD's are drowning our bussiness, let's blow some bubbles or we're history ! <running like scared chicken> SSD has a long way to go. SSD has way too many issues, for example, SSD drives fail much, much faster than a regular hard drive. That's why the warranty is so short on them. SSD drives get really slow after you have used it for a little while because it has a hard time getting rid of the old data. SSD drives are very small in capacity, and SSD drives are very expensive, just to name a few. Regular hard drives are very reliable (compared to SSD), cheap, and high capacity.

I'm not going to buy a SSD drive any time soon. I myself am using a couple of 10,000 RPM VelociRaptor drives in a RAID 0 array. It's not as fast as SSD, but I don't have to deal with any issues.

Hopefully SSD will get better soon, or maybe something else will come out to replace it. We'll have to wait and see.

Csimbi(07:55 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
@Kompressor
I think Ozieo meant that the HDD manufacturers woke up; if they want to stay in business, they need to offer something competitive or else the SSDs will take over. Four years ago the SSDs were so small that there was no reason to consider. Nowadays you can buy 256G and 512G drives. Sure, they are still expensive but as the new generation of SSDs come out, the price of these will drop so these will become direct competitors to traditional HDDs.

Yes, there are a good deal of bad SSD drives out there. Good SSDs come with algorithms to mitigate wear - extending the lifetime significantly. So, pay attention and make sure you buy the good ones.
I have two 40Gs from Kingston - these are over three years old. No signs of degradation so far.

gx-x(08:38 PM CET - Mar,22 2012 )
Csimbi> @Kompressor
I think Ozieo meant that the HDD manufacturers woke up; if they want to stay in business, they need to offer something competitive or else the SSDs will take over.


they are offering 1TB of storage space for ~80 bucks. How is that not competitive compared to 60GB SSD for the same price? I mean SSD is great and all that, but I am not really in a rush, regular HDD speed is just fine from my point of view.

Ozieo(01:52 AM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
Well, sure those multi-TB HDD's are great, i'm using these too as partitions to store big chuncks of data, like all my copies of the DVD's i bought and so :D
In this (clever) case, I have not the slightest idea how the heck i would fill my 120GB primary (working) partition, when i store big data in a seperate one.

If you do lots of simultanous work, like browsing, in the meantime fiddling with Excel, and perhaps photoshoping your self image, you'll be stumped how much faster an SSD is, particularly in those "average usage" situations.

gx-x(02:56 AM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
Ozieo> Well, sure those multi-TB HDD's are great, i'm using these too as partitions to store big chuncks of data, like all my copies of the DVD's i bought and so :D
In this (clever) case, I have not the slightest idea how the heck i would fill my 120GB primary (working) partition, when i store big data in a seperate one.

If you do lots of simultanous work, like browsing, in the meantime fiddling with Excel, and perhaps photoshoping your self image, you'll be stumped how much faster an SSD is, particularly in those "average usage" situations.


Actually, I wouldn't be stumped. Everything fits into 8GB of ram so programs don't need to use HDD for anything, well, the little that they do u se it for is so rare and so brief that I see no point in getting SSD. And actually, I use photoshop, illustrator and browser at the same time 99% of the time, every alt-tab is instant unless I have HUGE print documents open in photoshop and illustrator. Also, I used computers with SSDs so I know when and where are they fast/er and I am not that impressed considering the price. Sure, if you have a laptop with 1~2GB of ram and SSD (very unlikely scenario) it is going to work 5x faster than the same one without SSD. But with 8+ gigs of ram...not so much.
Don't get me wrong, it IS faster even with 16 gigs of ram, but for me it simply isn't worth it. If 128GB SSD was ~50-60 euros then sure, put OS on it, put some essential apps and ofc the swap file(s) from apps. But to be honest, I wouldn't buy it even then. I am just to lazy to to rearrange my 200GB C: partition into a 60-70GB C: partition on SSD (because I have to keep ~30% of those 128GB free so the trash collector can work, so trim could work and to keep SSD's speed because you really can't even fill those 128GB because SSD is going to be slower than HDD :D

edit: ddr3 is dirt cheap, like 15$ for 4 gigs, there is no reason not to have at least 8 gigs of ram. For lot's of simultaneous work without "lag" or need for SSD, get 8+ gigs of ram and instead of SSD buy an i7 or i5 (i7 is better because of HT and more L3 cache) it's gonna be blazing fast in any app and in as many simultaneous apps you want. SSD becomes redundant, you wont have a chance to notice it's benefits xD

Ozieo(06:24 AM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
OK

Baconnaise(01:44 PM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
I picked up a 128g SSD after rebate for 110 or 120 a couple years ago. The new ones I have are two 60g striped sata3 which are supposedly faster and support the fastest sata. There's a noticeable difference between ssd and the standard drives. Budget wise they're still overpriced unless you get on a rebate or sale of some sort. Regular drives haven't been fairly priced for quite a awhile as well. Prices of regular drives have stayed inflated and have opened up the option of upgrading drives to SSD depending on the situation.

Memory is dirt cheap if you're semi current. DDR3 is cheap to the point that 8-16g of ram is 30-60 bucks unless you get picky. This seems about right considering that the current gen supports up to 32g+ ram in many cases.

I don't see 6tb let alone 60tb coming anytime soon as the current economic climate and pricing of drives just won't support them. Things need to settle more before I get optimistic.

Csimbi(07:25 PM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
I can't help thinking that those factories had to be rebuilt for a reason... I still don't understand why on consumers' money instead of the investors'...

gx-x(07:52 PM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
Csimbi> I can't help thinking that those factories had to be rebuilt for a reason... I still don't understand why on consumers' money instead of the investors'...

because they can?! ^^

Csimbi(08:31 PM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
Sure, they can try. I at least did not buy a single HDD since.

gx-x(08:49 PM CET - Mar,23 2012 )
yea, neither did I, I bought 1TB seagate a year ago, maybe more, for like 70e (it's was probably 70$ in USA back then, our dealers just change $ to € and rip us off :D ), and I still have 300GB free so I am good :)

On the HDD subject: I am still expecting some kind of lawsuit against hdd manufacturers because of price fixing, supply fixing etc. It's only natural to see some part of their extra profits from that scheme get shared with others :D

Baconnaise(10:17 AM CET - Mar,24 2012 )
I waited until recently to buy some drives. Picked up 2TB for about a hundred a pop. I wouldn't have if it wasn't necessary for the setup in the home I'm aiming for while the kids are still toddlers and older. The 2TB drives should be under a hundred like 1TB was even way back. Hell even old raptors are still going for some change.

All comments
 Add your comment (free registration required)


Related news:

related cheats/trainer:

no results found


 External links