Updated:12:38 AM CEST Sep,05
NEWS
/ RSS
CHEATS
REVIEWS
ARTICLES
HARDWARE
DEMOS
FORUMS
LINKS
(
new
)
CONTACT
Please
e-mail us
if you have news.
(c) 1998-2026 Gameguru Mania
Privacy Policy
statement
SEARCH:
Gameguru Mania News - Jul,01 2004
-
view all
view only briefly
view only gameguru review
view only preview
view only media
view only movie
view only demo
view only patch
view only interview
view only tech
view only mod&map
view only gold
view only freegame
view only console
AMD Sempron 3100+ benchmarked
- tech
(hx) 01:37 PM CEST - Jul,01 2004 -
Post a comment
A64 2800+ (9x200 512kb L2 cache) to the left A64 Sempron 3100+ (9x200 256kb L2 cache) to the right
It seems that the Sempron is just 2.1% slower
in 3dmark2001, 0.4% slower in Superpi ,4.4% faster in Prime95 ,only 1.2% slower in PC-Mark2004 (0.25% Memory score / 2.2%CPU score) and only 4.5% slower in CPUMark 99 compared to the A64 2800+ wich runs at the same clockspeed!! The only difference between the 2800+ and the Sempron 3100+ is that the latter has only 256kb L2 cache. Also, the Semprons have their 64bit registers disabled, they are locked to work in 32bit mode only. Since Windows XP-64 is _STILL_ not officially released, and most drivers are still slower than for XP 32-bit and some drivers are even not available for XP-64, this move is just logical. Even without the 64bit registers this CPU is more than fast enough to compete with Intel's CPUs! and YES, it is basically a A64 2800+ with half the L2 cache. However, its seems that the missing L2 cache doesn't have a big impact on its performance.
last 10 comments:
Add your comment
(free registration
required
)
Related news:
Sempron 3000+ and Celeron D 331 tested
- tech (Dec 05 2006
)
AMD Sempron 3100+ on E Core Revision
- tech (Apr 05 2005
)
AMD Athlon 64 vs. Sempron comparison
- tech (Jan 31 2005
)
related cheats/trainer:
no results found
Links
Search results
for -
Sempron
- :
no records found
External links