| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggrobot
Elite Member
Joined: 28 May 2004
Posts: 45748
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 7:18 pm Post subject: Intel Claims i5-9600KF Better than 3800X [49552] |
 |
|
with gaming, when even the uot;sloweruot; 3700X is seen performing within 1% of the i5-9600K (identical CPU specs to the i5-9600KF) at gaming, and 22 percent faster at CPU tests, beating the i9-9900K in quite a few multi-threaded tests.
The marketing slide makes four key claims: 1. that Intel processors are fas
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Csimbi
Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 4790
Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's clear Intel was going to lose.
They still have nothing to show for in the foreseeable future.
No need to moan about it, go and lick your wounds elsewhere.
You were ahead but while your competition was working hard in the background, you did nothing but ripped off people with processors offering zero practical improvements.
Go back to the drawing board and give us something great at a reasonable price.
Until then, shut it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tom
Elite Member
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 4189
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Csimbi wrote: |
Until then, shut it. |
PLEASE! COULD YOU?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gx-x
Elite Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 2542
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Csimbi wrote: | It's clear Intel was going to lose.
They still have nothing to show for in the foreseeable future.
No need to moan about it, go and lick your wounds elsewhere.
You were ahead but while your competition was working hard in the background, you did nothing but ripped off people with processors offering zero practical improvements.
Go back to the drawing board and give us something great at a reasonable price.
Until then, shut it. |
It's a cycle, it always was. It just isn't bad for intel now as it was back in the Barton days 
..and AMD does have problems and if you are an average Joe, if they strike you, you will have a headache. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Csimbi
Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 4790
Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gx-x wrote: |
It's a cycle, it always was. It just isn't bad for intel now as it was back in the Barton days |
Indeed!
| gx-x wrote: |
..and AMD does have problems and if you are an average Joe, if they strike you, you will have a headache. |
Still on my 4790K (all other PCs around are 4790K as well), so I would not know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
devilhood
Elite Member
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 698
Location: Cydonia
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The sad fact with Intel, is that they do not have to give us anything at a reasonable price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gx-x
Elite Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 2542
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| actually, AMD has been selling their chips on the cheap side. This wont go forever, as we can see, their new high end CPU isn't all that "cheap" like previous one was. Intel could undercut them but they won't do it since they have sales anyway. Oh well... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
