Updated:06:24 PM EDT May,22
--> Facebook |
POPULAR CHAT TOPICXbox One Supports External S
MS Details Xbox One Game Ins
Xbox One: Microsoft's new co
PlayStation 4 See it First a
TechNews - Windows 8.1 will
Metal Gear Rising: Revengean
EA pulls plug on Wii U suppo
EA Kills Online Pass Program
Grim Dawn Alpha Coming Tomor
Hitman: Absolution - Quick L
Armed and Dangerous - Battle
NVIDIA Taking SHIELD Pre-Ord
REVEAL PLAYSTATION 4 PS4 E3
AC4: Black Flag - Golden Age
8 Years Ago Today, the Xbox
BlueStacks rivals OUYA with
Saints Row IV - PAX East Dem
Bioshock Gets A Fan-Made Mov
REDKit Released - Mod Tools
Rome II: Total War Collector
Hellraid - Teaser Trailer
TechNews - Adobe abandons Cr
(c) 1997-2013 Box Network Ltd.
last 10 comments:
| Google to push down copyright violators - tech|
|(hx) 10:33 PM EDT - Aug,11 2012 |
| In May, Google announced that it was adding a new page on its Transparency Report site called Copyright Removal Requests. The page showed which companies were asking Google to remove search results for certain websites. Now it looks like Google is doing more to try to stop those websites from appearing in its search results.
We aim to provide a great experience for our users and have developed over 200 signals to ensure our search algorithms deliver the best possible results. Starting next week, we will begin taking into account a new signal in our rankings: the number of valid copyright removal notices we receive for any given site. Sites with high numbers of removal notices may appear lower in our results. This ranking change should help users find legitimate, quality sources of content more easily—whether it's a song previewed on NPR's music website, a TV show on Hulu or new music streamed from Spotify.
Since we re-booted our copyright removals over two years ago, we've been given much more data by copyright owners about infringing content online. In fact, we're now receiving and processing more copyright removal notices every day than we did in all of 2009—more than 4.3 million URLs in the last 30 days alone. We will now be using this data as a signal in our search rankings.
Only copyright holders know if something is authorized, and only courts can decide if a copyright has been infringed; Google cannot determine whether a particular webpage does or does not violate copyright law. So while this new signal will influence the ranking of some search results, we won't be removing any pages from search results unless we receive a valid copyright removal notice from the rights owner. And we'll continue to provide "counter-notice" tools so that those who believe their content has been wrongly removed can get it reinstated. We'll also continue to be transparent about copyright removals.
|tride||(12:42 PM EDT - Aug,12 2012 )|
|Oh ok, ill set my default search engine to Altavista or something..... fuckerz!|
|heretic||(01:24 PM EDT - Aug,12 2012 )|
|This search engine looks pretty good. To be honest, I'm tired of google :-)
|Csimbi||(09:06 PM EDT - Aug,12 2012 )|
|Been using duckduck for long - any privacy-conscious person I know does the same.|
|Baconnaise||(07:27 AM EDT - Aug,13 2012 )|
|Internet censorship is bad any which way you look at it.|